Thirty-four County-owned housing assets across six municipalities, bundled into a single award with no partial bid and no fee escalator. The eligibility gates are documentary, and the incumbent already holds the paperwork.
What the County is actually handing over
Miami-Dade County, through its Department of Housing and Community Development, is soliciting third-party management for 34 County-owned housing assets totaling 1,784 units. Thirty of them draw federal subsidy through HUD Housing Assistance Payment contracts. The rest layer HUD 202/PRAC and 811/PRAC, IRS Section 42 LIHTC, FDIC Affordable Housing, HOME, SAIL, SHIP, Surtax, GOB, and NSP.
The portfolio is uneven in a way that matters for staffing. Lakeside Towers alone carries 384 units across eight five-story buildings. Fifteen assets carry fewer than 40 units. Four are scattered-site developments: townhouses in Wynwood, single-family homes in Goulds, duplexes in Perrine, and townhomes off Douglas Road, where a maintenance tech spends the day driving.
The scope sets specific operating requirements. One Regional Property Supervisor per 300 to 600 units. Emergency repairs closed within 24 hours. Vacant units ready in 15 days, backed by liquidated damages. Compliance fees and lost HAP funds passed straight through to the manager.
The three things that decide whether this is worth pursuing
All or nothing, for seven years, with no escalator
Proposals must cover every one of the 34 assets. There is no partial bid and no way to decline the hardest buildings. The Management Fee is a percentage of collected rent, quoted per property, and it is guaranteed for the full 84-month term including any extension. It must absorb all out-of-pocket costs, all off-site and corporate staffing, and the County's Oversight Fee. Insurance and utility escalation across that seven-year window lands entirely on the manager.
Eligibility is documentary, not narrative
A firm cannot talk its way in. The County requires active IREM AMO and CPM accreditation, a named reference client with a 3,000-unit affordable portfolio under active management, twelve months of NSPIRE results averaging at least 80 points, identified by development name, twelve months of MOR reports, three years of REAC reports, proof of twelve HAP vouchers billed and funded in the correct month, and a HUD-approved Budget Based Rent Increase on a 202/PRAC or 811/PRAC asset. Every one of those is a document that either exists on the shelf or does not.
The downside is transferred, the upside is capped
HCD will not fund deficits, a deficit may not be allowed to degrade service, and a deficit is grounds for termination at the County's sole discretion. Compliance fees and lost HAP funds from any monitoring, PBCA, or NSPIRE-V finding are reimbursed to the County in proportion to each finding. Liquidated damages equal to vacancy loss apply when a unit is not ready in 15 days. Meanwhile the manager's revenue is fixed at a percentage of rent collected on a deeply subsidized portfolio.
The verdict, and who it applies to
This is a defensible incumbent on a portfolio the County has publicly committed to fixing. Public records identify Royal American Management, Inc. as Miami-Dade County's managing agent for these assets, an AMO-accredited operator that already clears the minimum qualification and already holds the property-level inspection history the scoring rewards.
The path to displacement is documentary. Sixty of the 100 points sit on demonstrated experience and named personnel. Price carries ten, and it is scored subjectively rather than by lowest-price formula, so undercutting the field buys almost nothing and invites the obvious question about whether the number can staff the buildings for seven years. There are no preference points to lean on. Local Preference, the SBE Selection Factor, and the Veteran Business Enterprise Preference are all unavailable because of the federal funding, which means a Miami firm and an out-of-state firm start level.
Bid if you are an AMO-accredited affordable-housing operator with a Florida or Southeast footprint, 3,000-plus units under management, a clean federal inspection record, and an enterprise platform already in production. Pass if you manage conventional multifamily, HOA, or single-family rentals, or if you cannot produce twelve months of NSPIRE scores at 80 or better on demand. There is a consolation prize worth taking either way: the County intends to pre-qualify a separate Property Management Pool for work-order assignments and additional properties.
34 assets, six municipalities, roughly 45 miles from the northernmost site to the southernmost
Marker positions are approximate, derived from the addresses printed in the solicitation. Six clusters:
The revenue center. Lakeside Towers and Park Lake sit on the same block of SW 152nd Avenue and account for 466 units between them, over a quarter of the portfolio. The pre-proposal conference is held here for a reason.
Dense, elevator-served, heavily elderly. Little Havana I and Riverside carry 75 units each. Wynwood is scattered-site townhouses and duplexes, a different staffing problem entirely.
The former Miami Beach CDC portfolio. Twelve small buildings, none larger than 39 units, spread from South Beach to 79th Street. Highest political visibility and the documented deferred-maintenance history.
The longest drive and the most dispersed housing types. Perrine Rainbow and Goulds Homes are subdivision-style duplexes and single-family homes, where every work order is a separate trip.
Includes the only asset not yet in service. Magnolia North is a mixed-use building with housing on the second and third floors, listed in the solicitation as new and coming soon, a lease-up rather than a takeover.
Three of these are missing from the solicitation entirely
| Milestone | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Draft solicitation posted for industry comment | December 16, 2025 | Past |
| Solicitation packet issued | July 24, 2026 | Past |
| Pre-proposal conference at Lakeside Towers clubhouse | August 5, 2026, 11:00 AM | Upcoming |
| Site visits: Lakeside Towers, Senator Villas, Gran Via | August 5, 2026, immediately after | Upcoming |
| Deadline for receipt of questions | Not stated in the RFP | Verify |
| Proposal due date | See INFORMS. Packet filename indicates August 25, 2026 | Deadline |
| Evaluation and Competitive Selection Committee scoring | August – September 2026 | Upcoming |
| Oral presentations | At Committee option | Upcoming |
| Projected award date | November 2026 | Upcoming |
| Written objection to Committee ranking | Within 5 workdays of Coordinator Report | Waiver risk |
| Insurance certificates due | Within 10 business days of award | Upcoming |
| Proposal validity period | 180 calendar days after opening | Upcoming |
| Service start / mobilization | Not stated in the RFP | Verify |
The solicitation does not state a proposal due date, a questions deadline, or a service start date. The due date is deferred to the INFORMS portal and the packet filename is the only indication of August 25. Anyone building a work plan should confirm all three with the Procurement Contracting Officer first. One more trap: if you submit and an addendum is later issued, acknowledging the addendum without clicking Submit Proposal again voids the submission.
100 points per Competitive Selection Committee member
Cost is not determinative here. Price is worth ten points and is evaluated subjectively in combination with the technical proposal, not by lowest-price formula. Sixty points sit on demonstrated experience and named personnel, and both of those criteria are scored against documents the County names explicitly, including NSPIRE and MOR results. This is an evidence contest, not a writing contest.
| Criterion | Points | What it actually tests |
|---|---|---|
| Relevant experience and past performance in Federal and Non-Federal property management | 30 | Explicitly includes above-average NSPIRE and MOR scores |
| Experience and qualifications of key personnel and subcontractors | 30 | Resumes, org chart, certifications; President and Shareholder thresholds |
| Management plan, methodology, and approach | 20 | Eleven sub-elements including sample lease, budget with fee, maintenance plan |
| Financial capabilities | 10 | Certified financials, BBRI documentation, bankruptcy disclosure |
| Proposed price / Management Fee | 10 | Subjective, in combination with the technical proposal |
One more scoring mechanic worth knowing: under County Resolution R-321-23, any adverse finding or substantiated allegation from the Office of the Inspector General or the Commission on Ethics and Public Trust within the past seven years, against the proposer or any proposed subcontractor, goes to the Committee and can trigger re-scoring even after evaluation closes. Screen your subs before you name them.
The gates, the fit, and the pass
Active IREM AMO and CPM accreditation on the day of submission. A named client with a 3,000-unit affordable portfolio under active management, with a verifiable contact. A President and at least one Shareholder each with ten years of hands-on experience and an affordable portfolio of at least 1,800 units. Twelve months of NSPIRE results averaging 80 or better, by development name. Twelve funded HAP vouchers. A HUD-approved BBRI on a 202/PRAC or 811/PRAC asset. Active INFORMS supplier registration.
An AMO-accredited affordable-housing operator with a Florida or Southeast operating base, real HUD PBS8 and 202/811 PRAC compliance depth, CPM leadership, and an enterprise cloud property management platform already running in production. Section 2.4.1 of the scope names the required software capabilities in enough detail that a generic answer reads as non-responsive. The list runs from financial management, leasing, resident operations, compliance modules, BI dashboards with AI forecasting, eSignature, open API, mobile, and source-to-pay.
Conventional multifamily, HOA, and single-family rental managers should not spend the pursuit cost. Neither should any firm that would have to reconstruct its federal inspection record to respond, or that cannot confirm it can obtain Professional Liability at $1M per claim and Cyber Liability at $1M per occurrence, two coverages that are non-standard for third-party property management and are the most common gap in an otherwise qualified firm's insurance program.
Both documents, free. Drop your email and they open immediately.
Reviewing this RFP for real? Send it over and I'll score your draft against the evaluation criteria.